DENVER UNION STOCK YARD CO.
v.
PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION; AND BENSON, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, V. PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION
DENVER UNION STOCK YARD CO.
PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION; AND BENSON, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, V. PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION
353 U.S. 982
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260 (U.S. 1958)…nd originating in the District Court. 143 F. Supp. 240. All five are from the same Court of Appeáls, 241 F. 2d 71, 65, 78, 84, 69. The cases are here on writs of certiorari which we granted because of the public importance of the question presented. 353 U. S. 982. The facts of the Lake case are closely similar to those in the Wrather and O’Connor cases. Lake is a corporation engaged in the business of producing oil and gas. It has a seven-eighths working interest1 in two commercial oil [*262] and gas leases…
-
Ciucci v. Illinois, 356 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1958)…of Illinois affirmed the conviction, 8 Ill. 2d 619, 137 N. E. 2d 40, and we granted certiorari to consider petitioner’s claim that this third trial violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 353 U. S. 982. It is conceded that under Illinois law each of the murders, although apparently taking place at the same time, constituted a separate crime and it is undisputed that evidence of the entire occurrence was relevant in each of the three prosecutions.…
-
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n, 356 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1958)…r Union Stockyard Company to cease and desist from issuing or enforcing [the] regulation.” 241 F. 2d, at 196-197. Upon petition of the Denver Union Stock Yard Company in No. 106, and of the Secretary of Agriculture in No. 118, we granted certiorari. 353 U. S. 982. This Court now affirms. Its opinion, like that of the Court of Appeals, is based upon the conclusion that the [*300] regulations conflict with the provisions of § 304 of the Act. The majority have expressed the basis of their conclusion as follows…1 / 2