UNITED STATES

v.

KOPPERS CO., INC., SUCCESSOR TO KOPPERS UNITED CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Smith v. United States, 273 F.2d 462 (10th Cir. 1959)
  …harsh, “the remedy must be afforded by act of Congress, not by judicial legislation under the guise of construction.” Blockburger v. United States, supra [234 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 182]. In Hayes v. United States, 238 F. 2d 318, 322, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 1280, 1 L.Ed.2d 1142, this court said: “The fixing of penalties for crimes is a Congressional function, and what constitutes adequate punishment is ordinarily left to the dis [*468] cretion of the trial judge. If the sentence is within th…
• Dunn v. ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 370 F.2d 681 (10th Cir. 1966)
  …to depart therefrom, and to give the court full opportunity to make corrections. Franklin v. Shelton, 10 Cir., 250 F. 2d 92, cert. den. 355 U.S. [*684] 959, 78 S.Ct. 544, 2 L.Ed.2d 533; Cf. Hayes v. United States, 10 Cir., 238 F. 2d 318, cert. den. 353 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 1280, 1 L.Ed.2d 1142; Marshall v. Nugent, 1 Cir., 222 F. 2d 604, 615 (“an opportunity upon second thought, and before it is too late.”) The duty imposed upon counsel of “stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of…
• Gonzales v. United States, 286 F.2d 118 (10th Cir. 1960)
  …the defendant. The purpose of requiring specific objections to instructions is to afford the trial court an opportunity to correct errors. Rule 30, Fed.Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C.A.; Hayes v. United States, 10 Cir., 238 F. 2d 318, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 1280, 1 L.Ed.2d 1142; Palmer v. United States, 10 Cir., 229 F. 2d 861, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 996, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 861. Gonzales also raises the question of whether the alleged false or fraudulent statements had to do with [*1…