FERGUSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wirtz v. Savannah Bank & Tr. Co. of Savannah, 362 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …earlier admission but also to assert a new defense not previously pleaded. This cannot be done. See Systems Inc. v. Bridge Electronics Co., 3d Cir. 1964, 335 F. 2d 465, 466-467; United States v. Sinor, 5th Cir. 1956, 238 F. 2d 271, 277, cert denied, 353 U.S. 985, 77 S.Ct. 1287, 1 L.Ed.2d 1144; Simms v. Andrews, supra; 1A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 449, at 780 (Wright ed. 1960); 3 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 15.13, at 991-92 (1964). The motion to amend appellee’s answer is therefore de…
• United States v. Jackson, 425 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …by either party in which expert testimony on modus operandi was admitted involved policy playing and lotteries. United States v. King, 1892, 9 Mackey 404, 20 D.C. 404; Ferguson v. United States, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 239 F. 2d 952, cert. denied 353 U.S. 985, 77 S.Ct. 1287, 1 L.Ed.2d 1144; Forte v. United States, 65 App.D.C. 355, 83 F. 2d 612 (1936).8 Cases from other jurisdictions permitting expert testimony on the modus operandi of other criminal activi [*577] ties include Moore v. United States, 5 Ci…
• Schrader v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 280 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …has previously shown familiarity with the M.I.B. See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Strudel, 5 Cir., 243 F. 2d 90. . United States v. Willoughby, 9 Cir., 1957, 250 F. 2d 524; United States v. Sinor, 5 Cir., 1956, 238 F. 2d 271, certiorari denied, 1957, 353 U.S. 985, 77 S.Ct. 1287, 1 [*362] L.Ed.2d 1144; Halverson v. United States, 7 Cir., 1941, 121 F. 2d 420, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 695, 62 S.Ct. 412, 83 L.Ed. 556. But see United States v. Kelley, 9 Cir., 1943, 136 F. 2d 823.…