FERN ELIZABETH MESSINK, PETITIONER,
v.
MACK'S FOODS AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1966-02-23
No. 34937
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
183 So. 2d 531 Florida Supreme Court (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hines v. Hines, 184 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
    …ourt in Brackin v. Brackin, the order heretofore entered in this cause dismissing the appeal is vacated and set aside, and the appeal is reinstated for further proceedings. STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur. . Hines v. Hines, 1966, Fla., 183 So. 2d 531. . Rule 3.8(b), F.A.B. “If an appeal is taken from an order or decree awarding separate mainteance, support or alimony, the lower eourt may in its discretion, upon proper notice and bearing, order the payment of separate maintenance, support or al…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw