DELBRIDGE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-06-10
No. 579
354 U.S. 906 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In the light of the memorandum of the Solicitor General, the order of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and for consideration of such other relief as may be proper and just, after review of the full transcript of the criminal trial. Johnson v. United States, 352 U. S. 565. See also Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 88-89.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
    …n 14 cases in which a Court of Appeals has applied an erroneous standard in passing on an indigent’s application for leave to appeal. Johnson v. United States, [*441] 352 U. S. 565; Farley v. United States, 354 U. S. 521; Delbridge v. United States, 354 U. S. 906; Edwards v. United States, 355 U. S. 36; Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674; Hill v. United States, 356 U. S. 704; Cash v. United States, 357 U. S. 219; Hansford v. United States, 357 U. S. 578; Kitchens v. United States, 358 U. S. 42; Smith v. U…
  • …Workers Union, 230 F. 2d 81 (5th Cir.1956), rev’d on other grounds, 353 U.S. 448, 77 S.Ct. 912, 1 L.Ed.2d 972 (1957); United Steelworkers of America v. Galland-Henning Manufacturing Co., 241 F. 2d 323 (7th Cir.), rev’d on authority of Lincoln Mills, 354 U.S. 906, 77 S.Ct. 1293, 1 L.Ed.2d 1425 (1957). The foregoing cases cannot be read in a vacuum, however. They were part of a raging debate in the legal profession following the passage of Taft-Hartley over whether parties to a collective bargaining agreemen…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw