WASHINGTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Pendergrast v. United States, 416 F.2d 776 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …er appellant’s hearing testimony could have been used at trial for purposes of impeachment. See Proctor v. United States, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 404 F. 2d 819 (1968). . See Washington v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 99, 243 F. 2d 43, cert. denied 354 U.S. 914, 77 S.Ct. 1295, 1 L.Ed.2d 1427 (1957), affirming a conviction where the briefs and record squarely raised the point. . See United States v. Taylor, 326 F. 2d 277 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 377 U.S. 931, 84 S.Ct. 1332, 12 L.Ed.2d 295 (1964); Monroe v.…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Manager, 515 F.2d 988 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …onstrued as a whole is also germane to this situation. See United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc., 310 U.S. 534, 542-43, 60 S.Ct. 1059, 84 L.Ed. 1345 (1940); Smither & Co. v. Coles, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68, 70, 242 F. 2d 220, 222, cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914, 77 S.Ct. 1299, 1 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1957). Had sections 604 and 608 not contained generalized statements on the disclosure and discoverability of consumer reports, the FTC would have enjoyed its customary enforcement powers, including the power to obtai…
• Igneri v. CIE. de Transports Oceaniques, 323 F.2d 257 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …total indudes the District of Columbia, where Hitaffer is still the law as to the wife’s rights against parties other than the husband’s employer. The case was “overruled” in Smither & Co. v. Coles, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68, 242 F. 2d 220, cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914, 77 S.Ct. 1299, 1 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1957), but only as to its additional holding that § 5 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 905, see note 4 supra, did not bar the wife’s [*261] action against the employer. See also…