CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
354 U.S. 917
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marlin Brown v. McCORMICK, 608 F.2d 410 (10th Cir. 1979)…f the pleadings and the nature of the suit as expressly held in Smith v. Sperling, 354 U.S. 91, 77 S.Ct. 1112, 1 L.Ed.2d 1205, and the companion cases of Swanson v. Traer, 354 U.S. 114, 77 S.Ct. 1116, 1 L.Ed.2d 1221, and Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp., 354 U.S. 917, 77 S.Ct. 1375, 1 L.Ed.2d 1433. Appellants have advanced other issues on this appeal. They argue the Rule 37 sanctions were arbitrary and in violation of their due process rights. If shown, such action by a court will render a judgment void. See Ar…