DOPKOWSKI

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Frazier v. State, 107 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1958)
  …lso Edwards v. State, 1950, 194 Md. 387, 71 A. 2d 487, 492.); People v. Randazzio, 1909, 194 N.Y. 147, 87 N.E. 112; Watkins v. State, 1945, 199 Ga. 81, 33 S.E. 2d 325. This Court, in Thomas v. State, Fla. 1957, 92 So. 2d 621, 623, certiorari denied 354 U.S. 925, 77 S.Ct. 1389, 1 L.Ed.2d 1440, where a confession was made to an assistant state attorney after one hour of questioning in the jail, said: «* * * Exhortations to tell the truth, while under arrest, absent duress, threats, compulsion, hope of rewar…
• Young v. State, 140 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1962)
  …. If the judge is satisfied that the confession was freely and voluntarily made, such foundation for admission of the confession is presented to the jury who consider it as evidence in the cause. Thomas v. State, Fla. 1957, 92 So. 2d 621, cert. den. 354 U.S. 925, 77 S.Ct. 1389, 1 L.Ed.2d 1440; Sykes v. State, 78 Fla. 167, 82 So. 778. This rule stands [*99] despite the fact that the incriminating statements are made while the accused is under arrest, and even though the officer did not warn the accused that…
• Whitfield v. State, 479 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …were voluntarily made, they are admissible, but the question of voluntariness should be more stringently examined when the party is in custody. Louette v. State, 152 Fla. 495, 12 So. 2d 168. Thomas v. State, 92 So. 2d 621, 624 (Fla.), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 925, 77 S.Ct. 1389, 1 L.Ed.2d 1440 (1957). One may infer from the statement in this excerpt that the investigation should be made in the absence of the jury, that the conclusion should not be stated to the jury, though such inference is not absolutely…