RALEY ET AL.
v.
OHIO

U.S. | 1957-06-24
No. 306
Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.
354 U.S. 929 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (U.S. 1959)
    …ions. The cases are before us for the second time; on prior appeals the judgments below were vacated and the causes remanded for reconsideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178. See 354 U. S. 929. The remand resulted in a reaffirmance of the prior judgment without discussion, 167 Ohio St. 295, 147 N. E. 2d 847, and on the present appeals we postponed [*425] further consideration of the jurisdictional questions presented until the arguments o…
  • Flaxer v. United States, 358 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1958)
    …ppeals, sitting en banc, affirmed by a divided vote. 98 U. S. App. D. C. 324, 235 F. 2d 821. On petition for a writ of certiorari we vacated and remanded for consideration in light of Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178, an intervening decision. 354 U. S. 929. The Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, once more affirmed by a divided vote. 103 U. S. App. D. C. 319, 258 F. 2d 413. We again granted certiorari. 357 U. S. 904. The Senate Committee on the Judiciary or a duly authorized Subcommittee was authorize…
  • Abram Flaxer v. United States, 258 F.2d 413 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
    …called for by a subpoena duces tecum issued under authority of the parent Subcommittee. Contrary views prevailed in this court, after which the Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in the light of Watkins. 354 U.S. 929, 77 S.Ct. 1392, 1 L.Ed.2d 1533. Under Watkins a delegation by Congress or by the Senate or the House of Representatives to an investigative committee must “spell out that group’s jurisdiction and purpose with sufficient particularity. Those instruc…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw