SACHER
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-06-24
No. 884
Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Watkins v. United States, supra.
354 U.S. 930 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

[*930] Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Watkins v. United States, supra.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1959)
    …n into the field of education. The case is before us for the second time. Petitioner’s conviction was originally affirmed in 1957 by a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals, 100 U. S. App. D. C. 13, 240 F. 2d 875, This Court granted certiorari, 354 U. S. 930, vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case to that court for further consideration in light of Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178, which had reversed a contempt of Congress conviction, and which was decided after the C…
  • Sacher v. United States, 356 U.S. 576 (U.S. 1958)
    …ts the Committees of the Congress day after day. For these reasons I dissent from the summary reversal of petitioner’s conviction. * The concession appears in petitioner’s application for certiorari last year, No. 884, 1956 Term, which we granted, 354 U. S. 930, in connection with our remand in light of Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178 (1957). Nothing in the present application for certiorari controverts the concession.…
    1 / 2
  • Barenblatt v. United States, 252 F.2d 129 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
    …ered Watkins and its impact on Barenblatt. Taking account of all circumstances as noted, and believing the cases are distinguishable as indicated, we affirm the judgment of conviction. Affirmed. . 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 13, 240 F. 2d 875. . 1957, 354 U.S. 930, 77 S.Ct. 1394, 1 L.Ed.2d 1533. . Although Barenblatt v. United States, supra note 1, was heard in this court before a division of three judges, we sua sponte determined to hear the case on remand en lane. . “It would be difficult to imagine a les…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw