GUNDAKER CENTRAL MOTORS, INC.,

v.

GASSERT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• McGOWAN v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1961)
  …es of recalling them to the worship of their Maker.” See also Ullner v. Ohio, 358 U. S. 131; Kidd v. Ohio, 358 U. S. 132; McGee v. North Carolina, 346 U. S. 802; cf. Grochowiak v. Pennsylvania, 358 U. S. 47; Gundaker Cent. Motors, Inc., v. Gassert, 354 U. S. 933; Towery v. North Carolina, 347 U. S. 925. As respects the First Amendment the court said: “It does not set up a church, make attendance upon religious worship compulsory, impose restrictions upon expression of religious belief, work a restriction…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1961)
  …sues raised and for its decision thereon, including whether, in the exercise of its discretion, any injunctive or declarative relief is [*336] called for; and with the further instruction, in accordance with the practice utilized in Bryan v. Austin, 354 U. S. 933 (1957), that upon appellants’ request they be granted leave to amend their pleadings to meet the changed condition of the case as brought about by the Commission’s intervening concession that its order was void, as well as its renouncement of the ch…
• Diffenderfer v. Cent. Baptist Church of Miami, 404 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1972)
  …sion by this Court, United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36, 39, and n. 2 (1950), we vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand the case to the District Court with leave to the appellants to amend their pleadings. Bryan v. Austin, 354 U. S. 933 (1957). Judgment will be entered accordingly. Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…