GENE M. BURNETT, APPELLANT,
v.
PAUL B. JOHNSON, AS STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH, ED BLACKBURN, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida District Court of Appeal dismissed an interlocutory appeal because it was not a proper subject for such an appeal and the parties had settled their dispute. The court found no grounds to entertain the appeal.
No, the interlocutory appeal was not properly before the court. The court found no grounds to entertain the appeal.
“It was, therefore, not a proper subject for an interlocutory appeal.”
Establishes the primary reason for dismissal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an interlocutory appeal where none of the parties appeared for oral argument. The appellant and one appellee had settled their diffe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The above styled case came to this court as an interlocutory appeal, was set down for oral argument on February IS, 1966, and none of the . parties appeared before the court on oral argument.
We noted that the case was a law action and that the interlocutory appeal filed herein did not relate to jurisdiction or venue. It was, therefore, not a proper subject for an interlocutory appeal. We also find in the record that the appellant and Paul B. Johnson had entered into a stipulation for a dismissal reciting that they had settled all of their differences and jointly moved this court to dismiss Johnson as a party, which this court did on November 2, 1965.
We find no grounds for entertaining this interlocutory appeal and hereby dismiss the said appeal.
ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.