SCALES
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-10-14
No. 3
355 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 19 · 78 S. Ct. 9 · 1957 U.S. LEXIS 317 · SCDB 1957-005
Cited by 48 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (18 total)

  • United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1964)
    …th Cir. 1942). These cases represent neither a settled judicial construction, see In re Keegan, 18 F. Supp. 746 (1937),; nor one which we would be justified in presuming Congress, by its silence, impliedly approved. Compare Shapiro v. United States, 355 U. S. 1. Revenue Act of 1921, §250 (d), 42 Stat. 265, provided a four-year period of limitation on ordinary tax liability. The contrary view derives no support from the characterization •of the limitations provision as a' “statute of repose.” The present…
  • Scales v. United States, 367 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1961)
    …complish violent overthrow is cogent and adequately brought home to him. But, having said that, we have said all, in respect to petitioner’s claim on this point. 2. The “Jencks” Claim. When this case was first before us we reversed the conviction, 355 U. S. 1, on the authority of our decision in Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657. Before the second trial Congress enacted the so-called Jencks statute, 18 U. S. C. § 3500. Petitioner, as we understand him, does not now argue that that statute was inco…
  • United States v. Clancy, 276 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1960)
    …hat the right to challenge the grand jury panel was waived as the challenge was not seasonably presented in accordance with the ten-day limitation. In the recent case of Scales v. United States, 4 Cir., 1958, 260 F. 2d 21, reversed on other grounds, 355 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 9, 2 L.Ed.2d 19, the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision in refusing to entertain a motion challenging the grand jury. The decision was based upon Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, inasmuch as the lowe…

Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw