INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
v.
PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
355 U.S. 13
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wirtz v. TI TI Peat Humus Co., Inc., 373 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1967)…d H.R.Rep. No. 2738, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 29. . 337 U.S. at 765, 69 S.Ct. at 1279. . C.C.H. Labor Law Reporter, Wages-Hours, ¶ 25,243.73. . 5 F.R. 4916 (Dec. 6, 1940). . 7 Lab.Cas. ¶ 61,622 (M.D.Ga.1943). . 147 F.Supp. 169 (S.D.N.Y.1956) aff’d. 355 U.S. 13, 78 S.Ct. 16, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). . 324 U.S. 697, 65 S.Ct. 895, 89 L.Ed. 1296 (1945). . 324 U.S. 490, 493, 65 S.Ct. 807, 89 L.Ed. 1095 (1945). . 337 U.S. 755, 69 S.Ct. 1274, 93 L.Ed. 1672 (1949). . 337 U.S. at 761, 69 S.Ct. at 1278. . 337 U.S.…