UNITED STATES

v.

VORREITER

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Hulley, 111 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1959)
  …ited States v. Scovil, 348 U.S. 218, 75 S.Ct. 244, 99 L.Ed. 271; United States v. Colotta, 350 U.S. 808, 76 S.Ct. 82, 100 L.Ed 725; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co. Inc., 350 U.S. 1010, 76 S.Ct. 646, 100 L.Ed. 871; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U.S. 15, 78 S.Ct. 19, 2 L.Ed.2d 23. It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of this court in said cause be, and is now, reconsidered and said cause hereby remanded to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County for furthe…
• Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509 (U.S. 1960)
  …14] taxpayer’s state-created interests, we enter the province of federal law, which we have consistently held determines the priority of competing liens asserted against the taxpayer’s “property” or “rights to property.”5 United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15, reversing 134 Colo. 543, 307 P. 2d 475; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 350 U. S. 1010, reversing 227 F. 2d 359; United States v. Colotta, 350 U. S. 808, reversing 224 Miss. 33, 79 So. 2d 474; United States v. Scovil, 348 U. S. 218; United…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Pioneer Am. Ins. Co., 374 U.S. 84 (U.S. 1963)
  …a lien as specific and perfected is entitled to weight, it is subject to reexamination by this Court.” United States v. Security Tr. & Sav. Bank, [*89] 340 U. S. 47, 49-50; see also, United States v. Acri, 348 U. S. 211; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15. Thus the fact that, under Arkansas law, the claim for attorney’s fees becomes enforceable upon default as a contract of .indemnity does not foreclose inquiry by this Court into the degree the claim is choate at that time. There is nothing in Secur…

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Sec. Tr. & Sav. Bank, 340 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1950)