UPHAUS
v.
WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

U.S. | 1957-10-14
No. 332
355 U.S. 16 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire for consideration in light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Uphaus v. Wyman, 360 U.S. 72 (U.S. 1959)
    …termine, inter alia, whether there were subversive persons or organizations present in the State of New Hampshire. Upon the first appeal from the New Hampshire court, 100 N. H. 436, 130 A. 2d 278, we vacated the judgment and remanded the case to it, 355 U. S. 16, for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234 (1957). That court reaffirmed its former decision, 101 N. H. 139, 136 A. 2d 221, deeming Sweezy not to control the issues in the instant case. For' [*74] reasons which will…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw