GIBSON
v.
THOMPSON, TRUSTEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The jury's conclusion that employer negligence contributed to the injury was justified by the evidence.
The case involves an employee's injury where the jury found employer negligence played a part. The Supreme Court of Texas's judgment was reviewed.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Employer Negligence cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas is reversed and the case is remanded. We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512; Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U. S. 521; Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Deen v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 925; Thomson v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 353 U. S. 926; Arnold v. Panhandle & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 360; Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 354 U. S. 901; McBride v. Toledo Terminal R. Co., 354 U. S. 517.
For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted. Memorandum of
Mr. Justice Harlan,
with whom Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Whittaker join.*
For reasons elaborated by Mr. Justice Frankfurter at the last Term, 352 U. S. 524, I think that certiorari should have been denied in each of these cases. However, I continue in the view, expressed at the last Term, 352 U. S. 559, that once certiorari has been granted in such cases, we disbelievers, consistent with the Court’s cer-tiorari procedure, should consider them on the merits. Further, much as I disagree, 352 U. S. 559, 562-564, with the reasoning and philosophy of the Rogers case, which strips the historic role of the judge in a jury trial of all meaningful significance, I feel presently bound to bow to it. Applying Rogers to the present cases, I am forced to concur in judgments of reversal in Nos. 142 and 350.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (24 total)
-
Sinkler v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 356 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1958)…*333] R. Co., 353 U. S. 920; Deen v. Gulf, Colorado & S. F. R. Co., 353 U. S. 925; Thomson v. Texas & P. R. Co., 353 U. S. 926; Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 354 U. S. 901; McBride v. Toledo Terminal R. Co., 354 U. S. 517; Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18; Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 355 U. S. 62; Honeycutt v. Wabash R. Co., 355 U. S. 424; Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 356 U. S. 41; Butler v. Whiteman, 356 U. S. 271. Although the Court in footnote 2 of its opinion refers to…
-
Smith v. United States, 331 F.2d 784 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
-
Vickers v. Tumey, 290 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1961)…1958, 358 U.S. 31, 79 S.Ct. 2, 3 L.Ed.2d 24; Ferguson v. St. Louis San Francisco R. Co., 1958, 356 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 671, 2 L.Ed.2d 571; Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 62, 78 S.Ct. 136, 2 L.Ed.2d 93; Gibson v. Thompson, 1957, 355 U.S. 18, 78 S.Ct. 2, 2 L.Ed.2d 1; Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co., 1957, 354 U.S. 901, 77 S.Ct. 1093, 1 L.Ed.2d 1268; see annotation on sufficiency of evidence in FELA cases, 4 L.Ed.2d 1787. . The Trial Court, without objection, so instructed the jur…
Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (11 total)
- Rogers v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 352 U.S. 500 (U.S. 1957)
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
- Webb v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 352 U.S. 512 (U.S. 1957)
- Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 360 (U.S. 1957)
- Thomson v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 353 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1957)
- McBRIDE v. Toledo Terminal R.R. Co., 354 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1957)
- Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 354 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1957)
- Hawkins v. United States, 353 U.S. 925 (U.S. 1957)
- Simpson v. Teets, 353 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1957)
- Shaw v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co., 353 U.S. 920 (U.S. 1957)