HURT

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Bernard Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Hosp. Serv. Ass'n OF NEW Orleans, Inc., 712 F.2d 978 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …under group boycott charges). The per se category also requires coercive economic pressure. Klor’s, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., supra; United States v. New Orleans Insurance Exchange, 148 F.Supp. 915 (E.D.La.) (J. Skelly Wright, J.), aff’d, 355 U.S. 22, 78 S.Ct. 96, 2 L.Ed.2d 66 (1957) (per curiam). If the requisite factors for a per se refusal to deal violation are not met, the proper course is to examine the conduct under the rule of reason rather than to dismiss the charges completely. Joseph…
• Robert O. (Bob) Hurt v. McLEOD, 262 F.2d 109 (10th Cir. 1958)
  …s above referred to of the Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and, treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, denied cer-tiorari. Hurt v. Oklahoma, 355 U.S. 22, 78 S.Ct. 97, 2 L.Ed.2d 67. In his application for the writ in the instant case Hurt set up three principal grounds: 1. That he was denied a trial by a fair and impartial jury; 2. That his conviction was obtained by the use of false and perjured…
• Robert O. (Bob) Hurt v. Page, 355 F.2d 169 (10th Cir. 1966)
  …ely presented to the Oklahoma courts in post-conviction proceedings. And both factual issues have been decided adversely to appellant’s contentions. Hurt v. Oklahoma, 303 P. 2d 476; Hurt v. Oklahoma, 312 P. 2d 169, appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 355 U.S. 22, 78 S.Ct. 97, 2 L.Ed.2d 67. In such case the federal district judge may refuse to relitigate the factual issues and, indeed, when the district judge concludes “that the habeas applicant was afforded a full and fair hearing by the state court resulti…