TIMES FILM CORP.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
TIMES FILM CORP.
CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
355 U.S. 35
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reversed. Alberts v. California, 354 U. S. 476.
Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the petition for certiorari should not have been granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (U.S. 1964)…le standard the exhibitors of this motion picture may not be criminally prosecuted unless the exaggerated character of the advertising rather than the obscenity of the film is to be the constitutional criterion. Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago, 355 U. S. 35, reversing 244 F. 2d 432; One, Incorporated, v. Olesen, 355 U. S. 371, reversing 241 F. 2d 772; Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U. S. 372, reversing 101 U. S. App. D. C. 358, 249 F. 2d 114; Manual Enterprises v. Day, 370 U. S. 478 (opinion of…1 / 2
-
United States v. Klaw, 350 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1965)…dependent constitutional judgment oh the facts of the case as to whether the material involved is constitutionally protected.” Id. at 190, 84 S.Ct. at 1679. He added that “[t]his is precisely what the Court did in Times Film Corp v. City of Chicago, 355 U.S. 35 [78 S.Ct. 115, 2 L.Ed.2d 72]; One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371 [78 S.Ct. 364, 2 L.Ed.2d 352] ; and Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372 [78 S.Ct. 365, 2 L.Ed.2d 352].” Id. at 190, n. 6, 84 S.Ct. at 1679. In examining the material in Times…1 / 2
-
Kahm v. United States, 300 F.2d 78 (5th Cir. 1962)…e material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest.” The Court held that the statute here involved is stated in language sufficiently precise so as not to be offensive to the requirements of due process. . Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago, 355 U.S. 35, 78 S.Ct. 115, 2 L.Ed.2d 72, reversing 244 F. 2d 432 (7 Cir.); Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187, reversing 247 F. 2d 148 (9 Cir.); One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371, 78 S.Ct. 864, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 reversing 241 F. 2d 7…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)