EDWARDS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
  …s applied an erroneous standard in passing on an indigent’s application for leave to appeal. Johnson v. United States, [*441] 352 U. S. 565; Farley v. United States, 354 U. S. 521; Delbridge v. United States, 354 U. S. 906; Edwards v. United States, 355 U. S. 36; Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674; Hill v. United States, 356 U. S. 704; Cash v. United States, 357 U. S. 219; Hansford v. United States, 357 U. S. 578; Kitchens v. United States, 358 U. S. 42; Smith v. United States, 358 U. S. 281; Smith v. Un…
• Weber v. United States, 254 F.2d 713 (8th Cir. 1958)
  …od faith.” - If it were not for the decisions of the Supreme Court in Johnson v. United States, 352 U.S. 565, 77 S.Ct. 550,1 L.Ed.2d 593, and Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521, 77 S.Ct. 1371, 1 L.Ed.2d 1529 (see, also, Edwards v. United States, 355 U.S. 36, 78 S.Ct. 124, 2 L.Ed.2d 72), we would be of the opinion that the appellant’s application should be denied with-: out further proceedings. There is no showing that' the certificate of the trial court was arbitrary or unwarranted or not in good faith…
• Chauncey W. Whitt v. United States, 259 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
  …does not require that in every such case the United States must furnish the defendant with a stenographic transcript of the trial.” See also Farley v. United States, 1957, 354 U.S. 521, 77 S.Ct. 1371, 1 L.Ed.2d 1529; Edwards v. United States, 1957, 355 U.S. 36, 78 S.Ct. 124, 2 L.Ed.2d 72. [*161] Clearly the Court implied that in some “such case” provision of a transcript would be appropriate or even necessary.6 And this court has frequently exercised its power to order transcripts prior to determining whe…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Johnson v. United States, 352 U.S. 565 (U.S. 1957)
• Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)