MOUNCE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1957-12-09
No. 542
355 U.S. 180 Supreme Court of the United States (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and confession of error by the Solicitor General the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for consideration in light of Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1966)
    …han lesbians.” 241 F. 2d 772, 777, 778. There are other decisions of ours which also reversed judgments condemning publications catering to a wider range of literary tastes [*491] than we seem to tolerate today. See, e. g., Mounce v. United States, 355 U. S. 180, vacating and remanding 247 F. 2d 148 (nudist magazines); Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U. S. 372, reversing 101 U. S. App. D. C. 358, 249 F. 2d 114 (nudist magazine); Tralins v. Gerstein, 378 U. S. 576, reversing 151 So. 2d 19 (book titled…
  • Manual Enters., Inc. v. Day, 370 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1962)
    …that society tolerates. Of course not every portrayal of male or female nudity is obscene. See Parmelee v. United States, 72 App. D. C. 203, 206-208, 113 F. 2d 729, 732-734; Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U. S. 372; Mounce v. United States, 355 U. S. 180. Were we to hold that these magazines, although they do not transcend the prevailing bounds of decency, may be denied access to the mails by such undifferentiated legislation as that before us, we would be ignoring the admonition that “the door . .…
  • Kahm v. United States, 300 F.2d 78 (5th Cir. 1962)
    …lved is stated in language sufficiently precise so as not to be offensive to the requirements of due process. . Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago, 355 U.S. 35, 78 S.Ct. 115, 2 L.Ed.2d 72, reversing 244 F. 2d 432 (7 Cir.); Mounce v. United States, 355 U.S. 180, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187, reversing 247 F. 2d 148 (9 Cir.); One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371, 78 S.Ct. 864, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 reversing 241 F. 2d 772 (9 Cir.) ; Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372, 78 S.Ct. 365, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, reversing…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw