CANO ET AL.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA
CANO ET AL.
PENNSYLVANIA
355 U.S. 182
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 415 F.2d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1968)…shed, if they are not stayed or suspended pending appeal. Mandel Bros. v. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Co., 2 Ill.2d 205, 117 N.E. 2d 774 (1954); Keco Indus. v. Cinc. & Sub. Bell Tel. Co., 166 Ohio St. 254, 141 N.E. 2d 465, appeal dismissed, cert. denied 355 U.S. 182, 78 S.Ct. 267, 2 L.Ed.2d 187 (1957). Compare Gulf, C & S.F. Ry. v. American Sug. Ref. Co., 130 S.W. 2d 1030 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1939). Any such contention in this case is clearly foreclosed by our decision in Bebchick v. Public Util. Comm’n, supra note…