LADNER

v.

UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1958-01-06

No. 41

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

355 U.S. 282 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment

Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 270 · 78 S. Ct. 336 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1682 · SCDB 1957-031

Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1958)

…federal criminal statutes involved in Bell v. United States, 349 U. S. 81; United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 344 U. S. 218; and Prince v. United States, 352 U. S. 322. We affirmed the Court of Appeals by an equally divided Court, 355 U. S. 282, but vacated our judgment, and set the case for reargument, when a petition for rehearing was granted. 356 U. S. 969. Reargument was had this Term. [*172] It is suggested that the remedy under § 2255 is not available to the petitioner in the circum…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw