REEVES

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Felton v. The City OF Pensacola, 200 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
  …did business of pandering, as discussed in the Ginzburg case, supra. Nevertheless, we concur in what appears to be the generally prevailing view that nudity alone is not obscene. See Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372, 78 S.Ct. 365, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 (1958). That does not mean, of course, that nudity may not become obscene by its manner of presentation and by “pandering.” We fully realize the great difficulty faced by a judge or some other person, who may be charged with the duty of determining…
• United States v. Ralph "Whitey" Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …32 (1969), has refused to follow White, holding that the admission into evidence of consensual tape recording is constitutionally permissible. See Rathbun v. United States, 355 U.S. 107, 78 S.Ct. 161, 2 L.Ed.2d 134 (1957), reh. denied, 355 U.S. 925, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 355 (1958). On another occasion, on April 7th, Caron took with him to the BIRCA meeting a portable one-way radio transmitter equipped with an antenna in his sleeve, which was given to him by State Trooper David Paige for his protection.…
• Amsler v. United States, 381 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …cordings into evidence constituted a violation of this section because Irwin did not consent to the interception or publication of the conversation. In Rathbun v. United States, 355 U.S. 107, 78 S.Ct. 161, 2 L.Ed.2d 134, rehearing den. 355 U.S. 925, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 355, the leading case on section 605, the court held that there was no unauthorized interception where a third party, with the consent of only one of the parties to the conversation, listened on an extension telephone and later testified…