GORDON
v.
TEXAS
GORDON
TEXAS
355 U.S. 369
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Caution
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 352 · 78 S. Ct. 363 · SCDB 1957-039 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1659
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. Twenty-first Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Carter v. Virginia, 321 U. S. 131.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1964)…dment in concurring in the judgment. 314 U. S., at 397. In Carter, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Jackson wrote separate concurrences, relying upon the Twenty-first Amendment. 321 U. S., at 138, 139. Cf. Gordon v. Texas, 355 U. S. 369, upholding a similar state statute in a per curiam citing both the Twenty-first Amendment and Carter v. Virginia, supra. Prior to the Eighteenth Amendment, Congress passed laws giving the States a large degree of autonomy in regulating the importat…
-
Dep't of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co., 377 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1964)…at the Amendment has, in respect to liquor, freed the States from all restrictions upon the police power to be found in other provisions of the Constitution. The question for decision requires no such generalization.” Id., at 64. In Gordon v. Texas, 355 U. S. 369, the Court in a brief per curiam affirmed a Texas conviction for illegal possession of 11 bottles of rum which had been imported without a permit and to which the required Texas tax stamps were not affixed. The state tax in that case had been held t…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Carter v. Virginia, 321 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1944)