MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO.
v.
CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.
MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO.
CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.
355 U.S. 425
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgments are reversed. Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas, 355 U. S. 391.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Skelly Oil Co., 394 U.S. 678 (U.S. 1969)…rices during the earlier years in accordance with a minimum price order of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. After that order was vacated as a result of a decision of this Court, Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Comm’n of Oklahoma, 355 U. S. 425 (1958), respondent found it necessary to settle a number of claims filed by its customers; the repayments in question represent settlements of two of those claims. Since respondent had claimed an unrestricted right to its sales receipts during the y…
-
N. Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n of Kan., 372 U.S. 84 (U.S. 1963)…esources, does not warrant direct interference by the States with the prices of natural gas wholesales in interstate commerce, Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Comm’n, 355 U. S. 391; Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Comm’n, 355 U. S. 425. It has been suggested that those decisions are at variance with Champlin Refining [*94] Co. v. Corporation Comm’n, 286 U. S. 210, in which we sustained a state proration order designed to further conservation, against a challenge under the Commerce…
-
Skelly OIL Co. v. United States, 392 F.2d 128 (10th Cir. 1967)…was put into effect. This order raised the price of the gas appellant was selling under preexisting contracts, and continued in effect until it was declared invalid in Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of State of Oklahoma, 355 U.S. 425, 78 S.C. 409, 2 L.Ed.2d 412. After the order was terminated, a purchaser of gas from appellant during the period the order was in effect brought a suit to recover from Skelly the difference between the contract rate and the price order rate. This su…
Authorities Cited
- Cities Serv. Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n of Kan., 355 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1958)