BARNES
v.
NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1958-03-03
No. 202
355 U.S. 604 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dacey v. N.Y. Cnty. Lawyers' Ass'n, 423 F.2d 188 (2d Cir. 1969)
    …n in previous proceedings has been recognized in its prosecutorial role. In re Bercu, 273 App.Div. 524, 78 N.Y.S.2d 209 (1st Dept.1948), aff’d 299 N.Y. 728, 87 N.E. 2d 451; In re Roel, 3 N.Y.2d 224, 165 N.Y.S.2d 31, 144 N.E. 2d 24 (1957), app. dism. 355 U.S. 604, 78 S.Ct. 535, 2 L.Ed.2d 524 (1958). Dacey’s fear of the Association acting as a vigilante committee cannot be reconciled with the vigilante concept which normally embraces the thought of apprehension, trial and execution of judgment, all by the vig…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw