TAYLOR ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Benanti v. United States, 355 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1957)
  …ppeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, 244 F. 2d 389, holding that while the action of the state officials violated Section 605 of the Federal Communications Act, the evidence obtained from the violation was still admissible. We granted certiorari. 355 U. S. 801. Petitioner, relying on this Court’s supervisory powers over the federal court system, claims that the admission of the evidence was barred by the Federal Constitution and Section 605. We do not reach the constitutional questions as this case can be…
• Polcover v. Secretary OF the Treasury, 477 F.2d 1223 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …render murky the clearest of thoughts has run its normal course. Within certain guidelines, namely that an oral reply is assured, see Washington v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 284, 137 Ct.Cl. 344 (1957), petition for cert. dismissed per stipulation, 355 U.S. 801, 78 S.Ct. 6, 2 L.Ed.2d 19 (1957), that an interview with any particular officer is not guaranteed, see O’Brien v. United States, 284 F. 2d 692, 151 Ct.Cl. 392 (1960), and that an “investigator intermediary” is not permissible, see Paterson v. United…
• Adams v. Dep't OF Transp., 735 F.2d 488 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …ews 2723, 2786. 647 F. 2d at 1097. In support of the contrary position, petitioner cites cases, for example Ryder v. United States, 585 F. 2d 482, 218 Ct.Cl. 289 (1978) and Washington v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 284, 137 Ct.Cl. 344 cert. denied, 355 U.S. 801, 78 S.Ct. 6, 2 L.Ed.2d 19 (1957), which are clearly no longer controlling in view of the addition to the statute of the harmful error provision. Turning again to the precise language of the statute, I conclude that paragraphs (A) and (C) are direct…