KLIG

v.

BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Citator

Cited By

• Sinkler v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 356 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1958)
  …did not subject the respondent to liability for injuries of its employee caused by the fault of employees of the Belt Railway. 295 S. W. 2d 508. The Supreme Court of Texas denied the petitioner’s application for writ of error. We granted certiorari. 355 U. S. 809. Neither the respondent railroad nor its predecessors have, since 1905, performed switching operations in the Houston terminal area. Switching is a vital operational activity of railroading consisting in the breaking up and assembly of trains and t…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Duval Jewelry Co. of Miami, Inc., 357 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1958)
  …But it upheld the District Court as respects the subpoenas duces tecum, on the ground that the Board alone could rule on motions to revoke subpoenas duces tecum in representation proceedings. 243 F. 2d 427. The case is here on a writ of certiorari, 355 U. S. 809, which we granted because of a conflict among the Circuits. See, e. g., Labor Board v. Lewis, 249 F. 2d 832, 836-837; Labor Board v. Gunaca, 135 F. Supp. 790, aff’d 230 F. 2d 542. There is a degree of delegation of authority in connection with a mo…
• Bonetti v. Rogers, 356 U.S. 691 (U.S. 1958)
  …r of deportation involved here was issued prior to the effective date of the 1952 Act. Cf. Berrebi v. Crossman, 208 F. 2d 498, and Klig v. Brownell (dissenting opinion), 100 U. S. App. D. C. 294, 299-300, 244 F. 2d 742, 747-748 (certiorari granted, 355 U. S. 809; judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot, sub nom. Klig v. Rogers, 355 U. S. 605). Cf. Lewis v. Frick, 233 U. S. 291; United States ex rel. Claussen v. Day, 279 U…