COLLINS

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Luther F. Grant and Sirrka v. Grant, 282 F.2d 165 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …as been little discussed. We have said that such a motion “was in effect a complaint initiating a civil action,” Lapides v. United States, 2 Cir., 1954, 215 F. 2d 253, 254; Russo v. United States, 2 Cir., 241 F. 2d 285, 287, certiorari denied, 1957, 355 U.S. 816, 78 S.Ct. 18, 2 L.Ed.2d 33, and so it is in the sense with which the Court was there mainly concerned, namely, its independence from the later criminal proceeding and the consequent appealability of a final order therein under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. How…
• Jacobowitz v. The United States, 424 F.2d 555 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …6, 111 Ct.Cl. 487 (1948); 100 F.Supp. 455, 119 Ct.Cl. 86, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 856, 72 S.Ct. 83, 96 L.Ed. 645 (1951); Knotts v. United States, 121 F.Supp. 630, 128 Ct.Cl. 489 (1954); cf. Hoppe v. United States, 136 Ct.Cl. 559 (1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 816, 78 S.Ct. 19, 2 L.Ed.2d 33 (1957). This charge was minor in nature, was old, and plaintiff had already received a reprimand for it from his superior. His dismissal based on this charge was too harsh and an abuse of discretion by the agency under all…
• Rena Kardulas v. Fla. Mach. Prods. Co., 438 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …nstruction of the statute would defeat the purpose of section 282, which was to prevent unfair surprise at trial and to reduce expensive delays. Thermo King, supra at 674; C.S. Johnson Co. v. Stromberg, 9 Cir. 1957, 242 F. 2d 793, 797; cert. denied, 355 U.S. 816, 78 S.Ct. 19, 2 L.Ed.2d 33. We conclude that the excluded, but proffered, depositions were relevant and material evidence on the issue of a prior public use more than one year before Kardulas filed her patent application. 35 U.S.C.A. § 102(b). Fail…