DALY

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. The United States, 397 F.2d 826 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …n of establishing his liability to the subcontractor. See e. g., United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 737, 64 S.Ct. 820, 88 L.Ed. 1039 (1944); Donovan Construction Co. v. United States, 149 F. Supp. 898, 900, 138 Ct.Cl. 97, 99 (1957), cert, denied, 355 U.S. 826, 78 S.Ct. 34, 2 L.Ed.2d 39; Southern Construction Co. v. United States, 364 F. 2d 439, 447, 176 Ct.Cl. 1339, 1351-1352 (1966); Garod Radio Corp. v. United States, 307 F. 2d 945, 947, 158 Ct.Cl. 596, 601 (1962). “To come under the ‘Severin’ doctrine…
• J. L. Simmons Co., Inc. v. The United States, 304 F.2d 886 (Ct. Cl. 1962)
  …for them from the Government. This court has expressed the view that such clauses do not preclude suit by the prime contractor in behalf of its subcontractor in Donovan Construction Co. v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 898, 138 Ct.Cl. 97, cert. denied, 355 U.S. 826, 78 S.Ct. 34, 2 L.Ed.2d 39 (1957) and Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United States, Ct. Cl., 301 F. 2d 909. Defendant takes the position that the releases here involved are completely exculpatory within the meaning of the decided cases and, for that reason…
• Midkiff v. TOM, 702 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …d, 141 F.Supp. 300, 307 (D.Wyo.1956) (condemnation of reversionary interest in land leased by government upon which government housing had been built is for a public use), aff’d sub nom. Arp v. United States, 244 F. 2d 571 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 826, 78 S.Ct. 34, 2 L.Ed.2d 40 (1957). It is important to note, however, that in both of these cases, the government, not a private party, was the beneficiary of the condemnation. D Where the beneficiary of the condemnation is a governmental entity…