HEISELMOYER

v.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Riddell v. Monolith Portland Cement Co., 301 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …ar consideration of issues 1 and 2 on their merits. “4. In awarding summary judgment on issues 1 and 2.” [*491] As Judge Magruder points out so clearly in his Dragon Cement Company v. United States opinion (1 Cir. 1957, 244 F. 2d 513, cert. denied, 355 U.S. 833, 78 S.Ct. 50, 2 L.Ed.2d 45): “[T]he allowance for depletion has been a controversial subject for years, and officials of the executive branch have sought from time to time, with conspicuous lack of success, to persuade the Congress to eliminate som…
• Corpstein v. United States, 262 F.2d 200 (10th Cir. 1958)
  …medies, the District Court was without jurisdiction to review the action taken with respect to their farm marketing excess of wheat. Donaldson v. United States, 6 Cir., 258 F. 2d 591; Miller v. United States, 6 Cir., 242 F. 2d 392, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 833, 78 S.Ct. 48, 2 L.Ed.2d 44; United States v. Stangland, 7 Cir., 242 F. 2d 843; Lee v. Roseberry, 6 Cir., 200 F. 2d 155; Smith Land Co. v. Christensen, 10 Cir., 148 F. 2d 184; United States v. Lillard, D.C.W.D.Mo., 143 F.Supp. 113- Aifirmed. . In W…
• Donaldson v. United States, 264 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1959)
  …, U.S.C.A.; Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 48-50, 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. 638. The appellant did not comply with this rule. The previous rulings of this Court in Miller v. United States, 6 Cir., 242 F. 2d 392, certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 833, 78 S.Ct. 48, 2 L.Ed.2d 44, and Donaldson v. United States, 6 Cir., 258 F. 2d 591, are controlling in this case. See also: United States v. Bonderer, D.C.W.D.Mo., 139 F.Supp. 391, 396; United States v. Johnson, D.C.W.D.Ark., 155 F.Supp. 898, 900-901…