MARTIN' ET AL.

v.

S. BIRCH & SONS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Miles Dearden, Jr., 546 F.2d 622 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ere appeal. . See also United States v. Whiting, 308 F. 2d 537 (2d Cir. 1962) (holding that a Rule 15 motion filed on the first day of trial was properly denied for unexcusable delay); United States v. Broker, 246 F. 2d 328 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 837, 78 S.Ct. 63, 2 L.Ed.2d 49 (1957) (holding that a motion filed on the eve of trial may be denied for unexcused delay). . Did Goldstein say, hey, stop, no more sales? Did he say “Lets freeze the money, all money coming in and hold it for the benefit…
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …v. Buckles et al., 351 U. S. 984. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Justis, 352 U. S. 833. Chicago Great Western R. Co. v. Scovel, 352 U. S. 835. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. Co. v. Masiglowa, 352 U. S. 1003. Illinois Central R. Co. v. Bowman, 355 U. S. 837. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co. v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 897. Martin v. Tindell, 355 U. S. 959. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Thomas, 356 U. S. 959. [*25] Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Bush, 358 U. S. 827. Wabash R. Co. v. Wehrli, 358 U. S. 932.…
• Arnott v. The Am. OIL Co., 609 F.2d 873 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …arwash. Thus Arnott waived any right to sue for such alleged fraudulent representations; see Taute v. Econo-Car Int'l, Inc., 414 F. 2d 828 (9th Cir. 1969); Commodity Credit Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co., 243 F. 2d 504, 512 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 837, 78 S.Ct. 62, 2 L.Ed.2d 48 (1957); and Arnott is estopped from questioning the validity of the lease agreement and provisions therein. See Schutterle v. Schutterle, 260 N.W. 2d 341, 350 (S.D.1977). Moreover, Arnott entered into an accord and satisfa…