SWEEZY

v.

NEW HAMPSHIRE, BY WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL; STONEKING V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• City OF ST. Petersburg v. Waller, 261 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1972)
  …ed.) . 340 U.S. 315, 321, 71 S.Ct. 303, 306, 307 (1950). . 448 F. 2d 1371 (CCA 10th 1971). . Id. at 1373. . 251 F.Supp. 443 (D.C.D.Conn.1966). . Id. at 445. . Id. at 446. . Roth v. U. S., 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498, reh. den. 355 U.S. 852, 78 S.Ct. 8, 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957); U. S. v. National Dairy Products Corp., 372 U.S. 29, 83 S.Ct. 594, 9 L.Ed.2d 561, reh. den. 372 U.S. 961, 83 S.Ct. 1011, 10 L.Ed.2d 13 (1963). . 341 U.S. 97, 71 S.Ct. 576, 95 L.Ed. 774 (1951). . 18 U.S.C. § 242.…
• Donmoor, Inc. v. Sturtevant, 449 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …Engineering, Inc. v. United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, 207 F. 2d 450, 452-453 (3d Cir. 1953); Signal-Stat Corp. v. Local 475, etc., 235 F. 2d 298 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 911, 77 S.Ct. 1293, 1 L.Ed.2d 1428 (1957), reh’g denied, 355 U.S. 852, 78 S.Ct. 7, 2 L.Ed.2d 61 (1957). (emphasis added) 443 F. 2d at 785. Donmoor also cites Tenney Engineering, Inc. v. United Electrical Radio & Mach. Workers, 207 F. 2d 450 (3d Cir.1953). There, the court construed the exclusionary language in secti…
• Sherrod v. State, 484 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …nd to be proscribed.” Alexander, at 560. See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), rehearing denied, Roth v. United States, 355 U.S. 853, 78 S.Ct. 8, 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957), rehearing denied, Alberts v. California, 355 U.S. 852, 78 S.Ct. 8, 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957), clarified by, Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2794, 86 L.Ed.2d 394 (1985). In Alexander, supra, the supreme court upheld another exception to the concealed weapons statute on a vagueness challenge.…