KREAM

v.

PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT

Citator

Cited By

• Lipton Indus., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 670 F.2d 1024 (C.C.P.A. 1982)
  …tted under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules. Rule 8(d) provides: Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required .... are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading. See Mesirow v. Duggan, 240 F. 2d 751 (CA 8), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 864, 78 S.Ct. 93, 2 L.Ed.2d 70 (1957); Sinclair Refining Co. v. Howell, 222 F. 2d 637 (CA 5 1955); Dunlop v. Quality Spring Products, Inc., 20 F.R.Serv.2d 561 (W.D.Mich.1975). Appellant’s answers are, therefore, admissions. The purpose of Rule 8 is stat…
• Vokas Provision Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 796 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …der section 8(a)(4). See E.H. Limited, d/b/a Earringhouse Imports, 227 N.L.R.B. 1107, 1108 (1977), enforcement denied, 600 F. 2d 930 (D.C.Cir.1979); Better Monkey Grip Company, 115 N.L.R.B. 1170, enforced, 243 F. 2d 836 (5th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 864, 78 S.Ct. 96, 2 L.Ed.2d 69 (1957). . The most recent case in the Sixth Circuit to uphold the right of an employer to take disciplinary action against an employee for absenting himself from work is Grief Brothers Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 635 F. 2d 531 (6t…