ARGONAUT NAVIGATION CO., LTD.,

v.

KOTSIFAKIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kreager v. Gen. Elec. Co., 497 F.2d 468 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …roof on the Section 2 claims, they were properly dismissed without submission to the jury. McElhenney Co. v. Western Auto Supply Co., 269 F. 2d 332, 339 (4 Cir. 1959); Mackey v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 237 F. 2d 869, 873 (7 Cir. 1956), cert. dismissed, 355 U.S. 865 (1957). We also hold that the court correctly dismissed at the close of all of the evidence pendent fraud and deceit claims, since there was not a shred of evidence to establish the requisite elements of such a cause of action. Channel Master Corp.…
• Armour & Co. v. United States & Orville L. Freeman, 402 F.2d 712 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …pport an inference that the manufacturer acted predatorily by selling oat flour below cost. Price cutting was not regarded as unlawful under the common law. Mackey v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 237 F. 2d 869, 874 (7th Cir. 1956), certiorari dismissed, 355 U.S. 865, 78 S.Ct. 114, 2 L.Ed.2d 70. A pricing policy is not proscribed just because it might result in the destruction of a competitor, for the antitrust laws are not intended to protect a business against loss in a competitive market. Ben Hur Coal Co. v.…
• S. Blowpipe & Roofing Co. v. Chattanooga GAS Co., 360 F.2d 79 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …sometimes called ‘subjective intent to accomplish an unlawful result’. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594, 626-627 [73 S.Ct. 872, 97 L.Ed. 1277] ; Mackey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. [7 Cir.] 237 F(2) 869, 873, cert. dismissed, 355 U.S. 865 [78 S.Ct. 114, 2 L.Ed.2d 70]; United States v. Aluminum Co. of America [2 Cir.], 148 F(2) 416, 431-432; American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 781, 814 [66 S.Ct. 1125, 90 L.Ed. 1575].” (Emphasis supplied.) Appellant’s complaint, although l…