W. T. GRANT CO.

v.

JOSEPH, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Malinowski, 472 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …ual in July 1970, who was required to supply information to his employer, St. Joseph’s College, under Section 3402. [*854] Malinowski next stakes his appellate claim on our decisions in United States v. Litman, 246 F. 2d 206 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 869, 78 S.Ct. 118, 2 L.Ed.2d 75 (1957); United States v. Cirillo, 251 F. 2d 638 (3d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 949, 78 S.Ct. 914, 2 L.Ed. 2d 843 (1958); and United States v. Palermo, 259 F. 2d 872 (3d Cir. 1958). In Litman, this court faced the…
• United States v. Palermo, 259 F.2d 872 (3d Cir. 1958)
  …nt of “evil motive”, and strongly suggest its existence, but they do not, as the District Court held, make “inescapable” the “conclusion” of its existence. As we stated in United States v. Litman, 3 Cir., 1957, 246 F. 2d 206, 208, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 869, 78 S.Ct. 118, 2 L.Ed.2d 75, “* * * a pattern of behavior, as distinguished from a single occurrence, itself suggests willfulness”, but that is a far cry from holding that it inescapably establishes willfulness. Incidentally, in Litman, a Section 14…
• United States v. Greenlee, 517 F.2d 899 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …ake the required returns. We reject this contention. See United States v. O’Connor, 433 F. 2d 752, 754 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 911, 91 S.Ct. 874, 27 L.Ed.2d 809 (1971); United States v. Litman, 246 F. 2d 206 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 869, 78 S.Ct. 118, 2 L.Ed.2d 75 (1957). We are satisfied that the evidence taken as a whole warranted a finding that the failure to file here was attended by the bad purpose of an intention to violate the law by not fulfilling defendant’s obligation of…