BLASKI ET AL.

v.

DAVIDSON, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• A. Olinick & Sons v. Dempster Bros., Inc., 365 F.2d 439 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …sts stipulated in the statute and has decided thereon”, All States Freight, Inc. v. Modarelli, 196 F. 2d 1010, 1012 (3d Cir.1952); Great Northern R'y v. Hyde, 238 F. 2d 852, 857 (8th Cir.1956), adhered to, 245 F. 2d 537 (8th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 872, 78 S.Ct. 117, 2 L.Ed.2d 77 (1957); cf. Clayton v. Warlick, 232 F. 2d 699, 706 (4th Cir. 1956); Loew’s, Inc. v. McGuire, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 319, 205 F. 2d 719 (1953), the great majority of recent appellate decisions, including those of our court, indic…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 433 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …wed in one case it can be reviewed in any other. This Circuit has recognized the availability of mandamus as a limited means to test the district courts' discretion in issuing transfer orders. Ex parte Blaski, 245 F. 2d 737 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 872, 78 S.Ct. 122, 2 L.Ed.2d 76 (1957); Ex parte Chas. Pfizer & Co., supra; Atlantic Coast Line R.R. v. Davis, 185 F. 2d 766 (5th Cir. 1950). Cf. Ex parte Deepwater Exploration Co., supra. In the voluminous litigation over transfer orders, only a few l…
• Fine v. The Honorable Matthew F. McGUIRE, 433 F.2d 499 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …mpt correction by this court. The government argues that this court lacks mandamus jurisdiction to re [*501] view a transfer of venue citing Great Northern Ry. v. Hyde, 238 F. 2d 852 (8th Cir. 1956), affd. on rehearing, 245 F. 2d 537, cert. denied, 355 U.S. 872, 78 S.Ct. 117, 2 L.Ed.2d 77 (1957). That position is incorrect. Great Northern Ry. was overruled in McGraw Edison Co. v. Van Pelt, 350 F. 2d 361 (8th Cir. 1965) (en banc). Following an extensive analysis, the Second Circuit has concluded that th…