HSUAN WEI

v.

ROBINSON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Nimrod v. Sylvester, 369 F.2d 870 (1st Cir. 1966)
  …new trial is not open to review on appeal unless it appears that in denying the motion, the trial court abused its discretion. Hobart v. O’Brien, 243 F. 2d 735, 741 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830, 78 S.Ct. 42, 2 L.Ed.2d 42, rehearing denied, 355 U.S. 879, 78 S.Ct. 139, 2 L.Ed.2d 110 (1957). If the abuse of discretion is based on alleged errors in the court’s instructions, as is the case here, we cannot consider these errors on the issue of abuse of discretion unless proper objection was made with re…
• Friedman v. United States, 374 F.2d 363 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …nment as the prevailing party and all reasonable inferences must similarly be resolved in its favor. (Citations.)” The Court in Bryson v. United States, 238 F. 2d 657 (9 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 355 U.S. 817, 78 S.Ct. 20, 2 L.Ed.2d 34, rehearing den. 355 U.S. 879, 78 S.Ct. 138, 2 L.Ed.2d 110, at page 662 stated: “The weight of the evidence, including all factors of credibility which do not render the testimony incredible as a matter of law is beyond the scope of appellate review of jury verdicts.” Also see…
• Procio Rivero Pilapil v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 424 F.2d 6 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …sion or on abandonment of his authorized nonimmigrant status. * * * ” Therefore no rights under the Constitution of the United States relative to equal opportunity of employment are involved. Wei v. Robinson, 246 F. 2d 739 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 879, 78 S.Ct. 144, 2 L.Ed.2d 109 (1957). Affirmed. . 8 U.S.C. § 1105a provides: “The procedure described by, and all the provisions of sections 1031-1042 of Title 5, shall apply to, and shall be the sole and exclusive procedure for, the judicial revie…