MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP.
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; AND UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO. V. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.
MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; AND UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO. V. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORP. ET AL.
355 U.S. 904
Supreme Court of the United States (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pub. Serv. Co. OF NEW Mexico v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 832 F.2d 1201 (10th Cir. 1987)…. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 285 U.S. 119, 52 S.Ct. 283, 76 L.Ed. 655 (1932); Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133, 51 S.Ct. 65, 75 L.Ed. 255 (1930); Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Federal Power Comm'n, 252 F. 2d 619 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 904, 78 S.Ct. 331, 2 L.Ed.2d 260 (1957). These cases merely caution that a firm may control an affiliated company to such an extent that it is able to dictate the terms of agreements between the two. Where inter-affiliate pricing schedules are establish…
-
Tangfeldt Wood Prods., Inc. v. The United States, 733 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1984)…1978) (quantum meruit recovery for services actually rendered under a contract invalid for violation of statutes and regulations); New York Mail and Newspaper Transportation Co. v. United States, 154 F.Supp. 271, 139 Ct.Cl. 751 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 904, 78 S.Ct. 332, 2 L.Ed.2d 260 (1957) (damages allowed to put contractor in same position as it would have occupied without the invalid contract). The blow-down causing the termination here is said to render further performance impracticable and the G…