EARNEST A. BALLE, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARTIN'S SEAFOOD RESTAURANT D/B/A SHERRY'S RESTAURANT, FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT & HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date June 30, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed' with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.
THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
THORNAL, C. J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sandlin v. Crim. Just. Standards & Training Comm'n, 531 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 1988)…54 L.Ed.2d 159 (1977); In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor, 334 So. 2d 561 (Fla.1976); Singleton v. State, 38 Fla. 297, 21 So. 21 (1896). A full pardon removes all disabilities resulting from a crime. In re [*1346] Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 183 So. 2d 688 (Fla.1966); Page v. Watson, 140 Fla. 536, 192 So. 205 (1938); Singleton v. State. Neither the legislature nor the judiciary-may infringe upon the executive’s authority to grant pardons. E.g., In re Advisory Opinion (the administrative procedures act…
-
In re Fla. Bd. OF BAR Exam'rs (two cases). In re Admission OF Previously-Convicted Felons. In re George Kastenbaum, 341 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 1976)…civil rights by the Board of Pardons, would bar the applicant from the practice of law in the State of Florida except, unless and until such full pardon and restoration of civil rights shall have been granted.” In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 183 So. 2d 688, 690 (Fla.1966). Subsequently in a letter by this Court dated November 25, 1970, directed to inquiry made by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners and questions posed thereby, this Court expressed the views that a conviction under a federal statute wh…1 / 2
-
Fla. Bd. of Bar Exam'rs re: L. K. D, 397 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1981)…NDBERG, Chief Justice, dissenting. Today’s decision, though well intentioned, is shortsighted and ignores fundamental precedent. I must therefore dissent. To begin, the majority mischaracterizes the ruling in In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 183 So. 2d 688 (Fla.1966). The Court strongly implies that Florida Board of Bar Examiners holds that in the face of otherwise favorable character evidence, the facts and circumstances giving rise to a petty larceny charge cannot alone support rejection from the Ba…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence