SAUNDERS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1984)
  …t is convicted of two crimes, where a guilty verdict on one count logically excludes a finding of guilt on the other. Cf. United States v. Daigle, 149 F. Supp. 409 (DC), aff’d per curiam, 101 U. S. App. D. C. 286, 248 F. 2d 608 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 913 (1958).…
• United States v. Corson, 449 F.2d 544 (3d Cir. 1971)
  …Cir. 1961) ; United States v. Leather, 271 F. 2d 80 (7th Cir. 1959) ; Counts v. United States, 263 F. 2d 603 (5th Cir. 1959) ; United States v. Williamson, 255 F. 2d 512 (5th Cir. 1958) ; Purdom v. United States, 249 F. 2d 822 (10th Cir.) cert. den. 355 U.S. 913, 78 S.Ct. 341, 2 L.Ed.2d 273 (1958) ; Kitts v. United States, 243 F. 2d 883 (8th Cir. 1957) ; O’Keith v. United States, 158 F. 2d 591 (5th Cir. 1946) ; Holbrook v. United States, 136 F. 2d 649 (8th Cir. 1943) ; Holiday v. United States, 130 F. 2d 98…
• United States v. Ellis Raymond Williamson, 255 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …the thief necessarily had to enter the bank to commit the larceny. While these arguments are advanced with consummate skill and find precise support in the dissent3 of Chief Judge BRATTON, Purdom v. United States, 10 Cir., 249 F. 2d 822, cert den. 355 U.S. 913, 78 S.Ct. 341, 2 L.Ed. 273, we believe that the Government’s contentions are right and should be followed. The United States contends that Prince does no more than proscribe the pyramiding of sentences upon convictions for entry and larceny or robb…