RATHBUN

v.

UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES EX REL. AVRAMOVICH V. LEHMANN, OFFICER IN CHARGE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74 (U.S. 1958)
  …t of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that this was not error. 249 F. 2d 735. As other Courts of Appeals have followed a long-standing rule of evidence which bars a husband or wife from testifying against his or her spouse,2 we-granted certiorari. 355 U. S. 925. The common-law rule, accepted at an early date as controlling in this country, was that husband and wife were incompetent as witnesses for or against each othef. The rule rested mainly on a desire to foster peace in the family and on a general unw…
• United States v. Ralph "Whitey" Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …, 23 L.Ed.2d 232 (1969), has refused to follow White, holding that the admission into evidence of consensual tape recording is constitutionally permissible. See Rathbun v. United States, 355 U.S. 107, 78 S.Ct. 161, 2 L.Ed.2d 134 (1957), reh. denied, 355 U.S. 925, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 355 (1958). On another occasion, on April 7th, Caron took with him to the BIRCA meeting a portable one-way radio transmitter equipped with an antenna in his sleeve, which was given to him by State Trooper David Paige for hi…
• Amsler v. United States, 381 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …these tape recordings into evidence constituted a violation of this section because Irwin did not consent to the interception or publication of the conversation. In Rathbun v. United States, 355 U.S. 107, 78 S.Ct. 161, 2 L.Ed.2d 134, rehearing den. 355 U.S. 925, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 355, the leading case on section 605, the court held that there was no unauthorized interception where a third party, with the consent of only one of the parties to the conversation, listened on an extension telephone and la…