BARNES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …Eaton Go., 234 F. 2d 633 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 871, 77 S.Ct. 96, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., Inc., 146 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.Cal.1956), aff’d per curiam, 245 F. 2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 384, 2 L.Ed.2d 357 (1958). It did not, however, have before it this court’s recent decision in Timberlane Lbr. Co. v. Bank of America, N. T. & S. A., 549 F. 2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976). In Timberlane, we set down a “jurisdictional rule of reaso…
• Walt Disney Prods. v. The AIR Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …n doctrine and under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(b), both of which are necessarily dependent on state law. See e. g., Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.Cal.1956), affirmed, 245 F. 2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 927, 78 S!Ct. 384, 2 L.Ed.2d 357. Although no facts were alleged or developed in an effort to select which state’s law applies, the record does reveal that plaintiff is a California corporation, that defendants are California residents who did business…
• Rocha v. United States, 288 F.2d 545 (9th Cir. 1961)
  …621, 47 S.Ct. 531, 71 L.Ed. 793; United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F. 2d 416, 433; Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., D.C.S.D.Cal.1956, 146 F.Supp. 594, 600, affirmed 9 Cir., 245 F. 2d 874, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 384, 2 L.Ed.2d 357. The same rule logically should apply to national states, or nations. The acts done to violate § 1546 of Title 18 were all done outside the state, but they were intended (at least at the point of time when the fraudulen…