AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL.

v.

FRISCO TRANSPORTATION CO.; RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. FRISCO TRANSPORTATION CO.; AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V. FRISCO TRANSPORTATION CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, 358 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1958)
  …App. D. C. 77, 250 F. 2d 402. We granted certiorari because of the claim that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted our decision in Mobile, and on the suggestion that its judgment seriously frustrates the proper administration of the Natural Gas Act. 355 U. S. 938. It is apparent that the Court of Appeals misconceived the import of our decision in Mobile. The contract before the Court in that case required United to furnish natural gas to Mobile at a single fixed price of 10.7 cents per MCF (thousand cubic f…
• Okla. Natural GAS Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 257 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
  …53, 345 U.S. 988, 73 S.Ct. 1138, 97 L.Ed. 1397. . See, for example, Annual Report (1953) 112; id. (1954) 128. . Cf. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Federal Power Commission, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C, 77, 250 F. 2d 402, certiorari granted 1958, 355 U.S. 938, 78 S.Ct. 430, 2 L.Ed.2d 420. . I dissented in that ease on procedural issues, without reaching the rate questions considered by the majority. . Supra note 21. . We said: “The Commission found that Michigan-Wisconsin is ‘able and willing properl…