RIPPERGER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana, 472 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1985)
  …operative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna, 542 F. 2d 1375, 1376-1377 (CA10 1976); New Mexico v. Aamodt, 537 F. 2d 1102, 1109, 1111 (CA10 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1121 (1977); Alonzo v. United States, 249 F. 2d 189, 194-196 (CA10 1957), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 940 (1958); Garcia v. United States, 43 F. 2d 873, 878 (CA10 1930); United States v. Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church, 37 F. 2d 272, 274 (CA10 1929). See, e. g., United States v. University of New Mexico, supra, at 706 (§ 17 merely “re…
• Abdul v. United States, 254 F.2d 292 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …relates to a misdemeanor adequately and clearly point up that difference. Instructions similar to the one under consideration in the instant case have been upheld in Ripperger v. United States, 4 Cir., 1957, 248 F. 2d 944, certi-orari denied 1958, 355 U.S. 940, 78 S.Ct. [*295] 428, 2 L.Ed.2d 421, and in Yarborough v. United States, 4 Cir., 1956, 230 F. 2d 56. In the case of United States v. Litman, 3 Cir., 1957, 246 F. 2d 206, the Third Circuit had under consideration an instruction in which language simi…
• Edwards v. United States, 321 F.2d 324 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …States v. Cirillo, 251 F. 2d 638 (3d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 949, 78 S.Ct. 914, 2 L.Ed.2d 843 (1958) (“[‘willfulness’ requires] knowledge of the legal obligation”); Ripperger v. United States, 248 F. 2d 944 (4th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 940, 78 S.Ct. 428, 2 L.Ed.2d 421 (1958); United States v. Litman, 246 F. 2d 206 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 869, 78 S.Ct. 118, 2 L.Ed.2d 75 (1957) (the omission must be “advertent” and motivated by “bad purpose”); Yarborough v. United States, 230…