COLD METAL PRODUCTS CO.
v.
CRUCIBLE STEEL CO. OF AMERICA
COLD METAL PRODUCTS CO.
CRUCIBLE STEEL CO. OF AMERICA
355 U.S. 940
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana, 472 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1985)…operative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna, 542 F. 2d 1375, 1376-1377 (CA10 1976); New Mexico v. Aamodt, 537 F. 2d 1102, 1109, 1111 (CA10 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1121 (1977); Alonzo v. United States, 249 F. 2d 189, 194-196 (CA10 1957), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 940 (1958); Garcia v. United States, 43 F. 2d 873, 878 (CA10 1930); United States v. Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church, 37 F. 2d 272, 274 (CA10 1929). See, e. g., United States v. University of New Mexico, supra, at 706 (§ 17 merely “re…
-
United States v. Univ. OF NEW Mexico, 731 F.2d 703 (10th Cir. 1984)…7, made applicable to Pueblo lands by the Act of February 27, 1851, 9 Stat. 587. See United States v. Candelaria, 271 U.S. 432, 442, 46 S.Ct. 561, 563, 70 L.Ed. 1023 (1926); Alonzo v. United States, 249 F. 2d 189, 196 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 940, 78 S.Ct. 429, 2 L.Ed.2d 421 (1958). The United States alleges that sometime after 1935 the University and the other defendants physically invaded approximately 11.8 acres of land owned by the Pueblo without permission. The defendants deny the Puebl…