COLD METAL PRODUCTS CO.
v.
CRUCIBLE STEEL CO. OF AMERICA

U.S. | 1958-02-03
No. 680
355 U.S. 940 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …operative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna, 542 F. 2d 1375, 1376-1377 (CA10 1976); New Mexico v. Aamodt, 537 F. 2d 1102, 1109, 1111 (CA10 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1121 (1977); Alonzo v. United States, 249 F. 2d 189, 194-196 (CA10 1957), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 940 (1958); Garcia v. United States, 43 F. 2d 873, 878 (CA10 1930); United States v. Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church, 37 F. 2d 272, 274 (CA10 1929). See, e. g., United States v. University of New Mexico, supra, at 706 (§ 17 merely “re…
  • United States v. Univ. OF NEW Mexico, 731 F.2d 703 (10th Cir. 1984)
    …7, made applicable to Pueblo lands by the Act of February 27, 1851, 9 Stat. 587. See United States v. Candelaria, 271 U.S. 432, 442, 46 S.Ct. 561, 563, 70 L.Ed. 1023 (1926); Alonzo v. United States, 249 F. 2d 189, 196 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 940, 78 S.Ct. 429, 2 L.Ed.2d 421 (1958). The United States alleges that sometime after 1935 the University and the other defendants physically invaded approximately 11.8 acres of land owned by the Pueblo without permission. The defendants deny the Puebl…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw