EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Elec. Coop., Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1958)
  …nt’s negligence. He had judgment on a jury verdict. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and directed the entry of judgment for the respondent. 238 F. 2d 346. We granted certiorari, 352 U. S. 999, and subsequently ordered reargument, 355 U. S. 950. The respondent is in the business of selling electric power to subscribers in rural sections of South Carolina. The petitioner was employed as a lineman in the construction crew of a construction contractor. The contractor, R. H. Bouligny, Inc., h…
• California v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 369 U.S. 482 (U.S. 1962)
  …” with regard to the merger resided with the Commission and sought to have the antitrust action stayed. Its motion was denied by the District Court, and on March 3, 1958, we denied leave to file a petition for common-law certiorari to that decision. 355 U. S. 950. When the case was returned to the District Court the Government again made no effort to obtain from that court an order maintaining the status quo pending the outcome of the suit. Instead, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Blue Ridge Rural Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Byrd, 264 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1958)
  …e Ridge had complied with the Workmen’s Compensation statute of South Carolina and that Byrd’s remedy was confined to compensation under that act. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, 352 U.S. 999, 77 S.Ct. 557, 1 L.Ed.2d 544, and after reargument, 355 U.S. 950, 78 S.Ct. 530, 2 L.Ed.2d 527, reversed our decision, 356 U.S. 525, 78 S.Ct. 893, 2 L.Ed.2d 953, on the ground that the facts had not been sufficiently developed in the District Court and remanded the case for further proceedings. The facts necessar…