LEE ET AL.

v.

CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS

Citator

Cited By

• Brenner v. Manson, 383 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1966)
  …clear conflict between the Patent Office and the CCPA, there arguably exists one between the CCPA and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. See Petrocarbon [*523] Limited v. Watson, 101 U. S. App. D. C. 214, 247 F. 2d 800, cert. denied, 355 U. S. 955. But see Application of Szwarc, 50 C. C. P. A. (Pat.) 1571, 1576-1583, 319 F. 2d 277, 281-286. The present case is the first in which the Government has taken the position that § 1256 confers jurisdiction upon this Court to review patent decisions…
• Beaver v. United States, 350 F.2d 4 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …ellants here seek to apply the ‘re-emergence’ doctrine to render nonriparian land that was originally riparian. This is directly contrary to the purposes of the exception. ■*#*#** “Stone v. McFarlin, 249 F. 2d 54, 55-57 (C.A.10, 1957), cert. den., 355 U.S. 955 [78 S.Ct. 540, 2 L.Ed.2d 531] * * * Anderson-Tully Co. v. Tingle, 166 F. 2d 224 (C.A.5, 1948), cert. den., 335 U.S. 816 [69 S.Ct. 36, 93 L.Ed. 371], where the court stated (pp. 228-229): ‘Where a river is a boundary and there is no avulsion, a land-…
• Application of Michael Mojzesz Szwarc, 319 F.2d 277 (C.C.P.A. 1963)
  …which has already been decided by a court of competent jurisdiction. That we cannot do. I would affirm P.A. 6462 as to all claims, and would dismiss P.A. 7000 as not involving an appealable question. . 101 App.D.C. 214, 247 F. 2d 800, cert. denied 355 U.S. 955, 78 S.Ct. 540, 2 L.Ed.2d 531, petition for rehearing denied 356 U.S. 978, 78 S.Ct. 1134, 2 L.Ed.2d 1146. . The Szwarc application was held not to include an adequate description of the manner of using the invention as required by 35 U.S.C. § 112.…

  ← 1 / 2 →