FRANKLIN

v.

SHELTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• N. W. Trailer Sales v. McCANN, 217 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1968)
  …is not mandatory. The deputy has a discretion to decide whether the additional examination and report are [*312] needed. The statute provides that he “may-designate a disinterested doctor.” Martin v. Tindell, 98 So. 2d 473 (Fla.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959, 78 S.Ct. 545, 2 L.Ed. 2d 534. Hammersla v. Price, 190 So. 2d 765 (Fla.1966). The statute expressly provides that the report or testimony of the designated doctor shall be made a part of the record. Significantly it is required that it “shall be gi…
• Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …conduct by parties, witnesses and counsel. Standard Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp, 475 F. 2d 220, 228 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 829, 94 S.Ct. 55, 38 L.Ed.2d 63; see Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F. 2d 92, 99-100 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959, 78 S.Ct. 544, 2 L.Ed.2d 533. Furthermore, even though it is true, as plaintiff states, that defendant did not object to many of the errors it now complains of, we acknowledge the proposition asserted by defendant that litigants are entitled to a f…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …icago Great Western R. Co. v. Scovel, 352 U. S. 835. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. Co. v. Masiglowa, 352 U. S. 1003. Illinois Central R. Co. v. Bowman, 355 U. S. 837. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co. v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 897. Martin v. Tindell, 355 U. S. 959. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Thomas, 356 U. S. 959. [*25] Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Bush, 358 U. S. 827. Wabash R. Co. v. Wehrli, 358 U. S. 932. Butler et al. v. Watts, 359 U. S. 926. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Byrne, 359 U. S. 960. Illinoi…